20世纪五六十年代中国自然保护区建设的实践与启示

Practice and implications of China′s nature reserve construction in the 1950s and 1960s

  • 摘要: 20世纪五六十年代是我国自然保护区建设的初创与奠基阶段。1956年, 鼎湖山自然保护区的正式设立, 标志着我国制度化自然保护实践的起步, 成为探索走中国特色自然保护道路的重要开端。通过对史料与历史文献的系统梳理, 考察了该时期自然保护区建设的缘起、特征、经验与启示。研究发现:(1)自然保护区的设立源于科学界保护意识与国家建设需求的双重驱动, 体现了党在治国理政中对人与自然关系的认识与理念转变——从“征服自然”转向“尊重自然”, 反映了国家对生态保护与经济发展辩证关系的深刻把握, 推动了自然保护从科学理念向制度实践的转化。(2)早期建设实践形成了以“资源保存”与“科研基地”为核心的功能定位, 构建了“部门主导、科研协同、自上而下”的管理模式, 其空间布局呈现出基于生态稀缺性与科学代表性的选址逻辑。(3)该阶段开创性的探索实现了我国自然保护区从无到有的历史性突破, 初步构建了自然保护地体系的基本雏形, 同时也暴露出制度建设滞后、保护类型单一等历史局限性。系统总结初创阶段的经验与启示, 有助于深化对新中国自然保护道路形成逻辑的理解, 为生态文明时代完善自然保护地体系、创新生态治理模式、推动人与自然和谐共生的现代化建设提供历史参照与实践镜鉴。

     

    Abstract: The 1950s and 1960s marked the initial and foundational stage of nature reserve construction in China. In 1956, the establishment of the Dinghu Mountain Nature Reserve signaled the institutionalization of nature conservation efforts in China, representing a crucial starting point in exploring a conservation path with Chinese characteristics. Based on a systematic review of historical materials and literature, this paper examines the origins, characteristics, experiences, and lessons of nature reserve construction during this period. The findings reveal that: (1) The establishment of nature reserves was driven by both the awakening of conservation awareness within the scientific community and national development needs. This process reflects the shift in the Party′s understanding of the relationship between humans and nature from "conquering nature" to "respecting nature". This demonstrates a profound grasp of the dialectical relationship between ecological protection and economic development, and facilitates the transition of ecological conservation concepts from scientific cognition to institutionalized practice. (2) Early practices established the functional orientation centered on "resource conservation" and "scientific research, " forming a management model characterized by "departmental leadership, scientific research collaboration, and top-down administration". Spatial planning adhered to site selection principles based on ecological rarity and scientific representativeness. (3) The pioneering efforts of this period achieved a historic breakthrough in establishing China′s nature reserve system from scratch, laying a basic framework. However, historical limitations were also exposed, such as lagging institutional development and narrow coverage of conservation types. A systematic summary of the experiences and insights from this foundational stage contributes to a deeper understanding of the logic behind the formation of nature conservation pathways in New China. It also provides historical references and practical guidance for improving the nature reserve system, innovating ecological governance models, and advancing the modernization of harmonious coexistence between humans and nature in the era of ecological civilization.

     

/

返回文章
返回